Radiometric dating hoax Free cybersex video chats with horny females
For take off, a pilot needs to know things like: wind direction and speed, runway direction and length, aircraft weight, air temperature and altitude above sea level, runway condition (wet, dry, snow covered, etc.). And as noted above, those guess have been shown to be consistently wrong.Given all the needed factors (and pilots are required to know them and plan for them before every flight) a pilot can accurately predict the performance of his aircraft so he can determine whether he can safely take off and conduct the flight. The Science and Guesswork of Radiometric Dating The science Age is not a quantity that can be directly measured.And the differences can be quite dramatic: Basalt – a type of volcanic rock – dated by K-Ar to 45 million years old, while unfossilized wood entombed in the basalt is dated to 45 thousand years old by Carbon14 dating. Or the indisputable example of rock formed during the Mt Saint Helens eruption in 1980.We know the age of those rocks because humans were there to observe the formation. Why this cavalier attitude toward the inaccuracy of all radiometric dating methods?
Yet this is precisely the situation we have with radiometric dating.
The discrepancies between the rejected and accepted data are arbitrarily attributed to excess or loss of argon. Radiometric Dating Indicates different ages by different methods “Rejected and accepted data”? In other words scientists are saying they themselves will not accept some data from radiometric dating because they believe it to be wrong. You would expect your weight would be the same regardless of the method the device used to quantify your weight.
Additionally they know that different methods of dating are providing different ages. So within a narrow tolerance of a few ounces or perhaps a pound or two, a spring scale should provide the same weight as a balance scale (like what you might see in physicians’ offices), which should provide the same result as an electronic scale.
Predictable: Since they’re repeatable, they’re also predictable.
So aircraft designers and pilots can predict, given a certain set of circumstances precisely how much runway a plane will need to take off , and land; how much fuel will be burned, etc. Given the same conditions, the aircraft doesn’t need 2,000 feet of runway to take off one day, and 500 feet to take off the next day, and 3,000 feet another day.